Free Ebook Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher
The way to get this publication Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher is quite simple. You could not go for some locations and also spend the time to only discover guide Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher Actually, you might not consistently obtain the book as you're willing. Yet here, just by search as well as find Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher, you could obtain the lists of guides that you really expect. In some cases, there are numerous publications that are showed. Those publications naturally will impress you as this Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher compilation.
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher
Free Ebook Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher
Pointer in deciding on the most effective book Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher to read this day can be gained by reading this page. You could find the most effective book Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher that is sold in this world. Not just had guides released from this country, however also the various other countries. As well as currently, we mean you to review Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher as one of the reading products. This is only one of the very best books to accumulate in this website. Check out the web page and also look guides Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher You could discover lots of titles of the books supplied.
If you ally require such a referred Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher book that will certainly give you worth, obtain the most effective seller from us currently from several preferred authors. If you want to entertaining publications, many books, tale, jokes, and more fictions collections are likewise launched, from best seller to the most current released. You may not be confused to take pleasure in all book collections Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher that we will certainly supply. It is not regarding the costs. It has to do with what you require now. This Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher, as one of the best sellers below will be among the appropriate selections to review.
Locating the appropriate Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher publication as the appropriate need is sort of lucks to have. To start your day or to end your day at night, this Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher will be proper sufficient. You can merely hunt for the ceramic tile here and also you will get guide Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher referred. It will not trouble you to reduce your important time to opt for shopping book in store. In this way, you will also spend cash to spend for transport and various other time spent.
By downloading and install the online Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher publication here, you will certainly get some benefits not to go for the book store. Just link to the net as well as start to download the page link we share. Currently, your Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher is ready to delight in reading. This is your time and also your serenity to get all that you really want from this publication Science, Truth, And Democracy (Oxford Studies In The Philosophy Of Science), By Philip Kitcher
Striving to boldly redirect the philosophy of science, this book by renowned philosopher Philip Kitcher examines the heated debate surrounding the role of science in shaping our lives. Kitcher explores the sharp divide between those who believe that the pursuit of scientific knowledge is always valuable and necessary--the purists--and those who believe that it invariably serves the interests of people in positions of power. In a daring turn, he rejects both perspectives, working out a more realistic image of the sciences--one that allows for the possibility of scientific truth, but nonetheless permits social consensus to determine which avenues to investigate. He then proposes a democratic and deliberative framework for responsible scientists to follow.
Controversial, powerful, yet engaging, this volume will appeal to a wide range of readers. Kitcher's nuanced analysis and authoritative conclusion will interest countless scientists as well as all readers of science--scholars and laypersons alike.
- Sales Rank: #606531 in Books
- Published on: 2003-09-25
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 6.00" h x .90" w x 9.10" l, .75 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 240 pages
Review
"In Science, Truth, and Democracy, this philosopher of science at Columbia University revises and builds on his earlier account to debunk what he refers to as the theology of science-the idea that science is a high calling dedicated to ends that transcend all others-and to oppose the demonization of science...thought-provoking." -- Lewis Wolpert, Science
"Science, Truth, and Democracy is an outstandingly good book; it flashes with the steel of reason."--New York Times Book Review
"Kitcher navigates very skillfully between the extremes of positivistic science-worship and Foucauldian distrust of 'regimes of truth'. His novel and plausible answer to the question 'Why seek scientific truth?' will help bring the increasingly tedious Science Wars to a close. His argument that we need what he calls 'well-ordered science' is an important contribution to political thought."--Richard Rorty, Stanford University
"Mr Kitcher holds that the democratic way of doing this is better than any alternative.... But could it, he asks, serve us better? Does it ignore opportunities for the advancement of knowledge and the betterment of humankind? Yes, he suggests, on both counts. Thanks to [Kitcher, et. al], such questions are being asked again in a serious and responsible way. Science can only be richer and healthier for it."--The Economist
"Kitcher is one of the leading figures in contemporary philosophy of science, and [this book] expounds some significant developments in his general view of the sciences, as well as original treatments of some fundamentally important and increasingly topical issues...it will certainly be widely read and discussed by philosophers of science and a good number of scientists and other students of scientists."--John Dupré, University of Exeter
"Philip Kitcher's Science, Truth and Democracy joins generosity to argument. Throughout, Kitcher remains engaged with reason as he tries to understand, critically, the positions of realists, creationists, empiricists, and constructivists. It is a lucid book that should appeal to a wide public interested in current debates about science--from its philosophical status to its policy implications in the age of genomics."--Peter Galison, Mallinckrodt Professor of the History of Science and of Physics, Harvard University
About the Author
Philip Kitcher is Professor of Philosophy at Columbia University and author of The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge (O.U.P., 1983); The Advancement of Science (O.U.P., 1993); and In Mendel's Mirror (O.U.P., 2003).
Most helpful customer reviews
27 of 34 people found the following review helpful.
Well written, engaging, but with a fundamental oversight
By Keith Douglas
Philip Kitcher again shines as a well informed philosopher of science. This book can be regarded as a sequel to his magnum opus _The Advancement of Science_. It deals with the relativists and antirealists quite well, though does presuppose some familiarity with these debates.
However, I find that Kitcher's new position on the nature of science and its relations to society at large suffers from an apparently glaring oversight. He tells us that those who have a stake in the outcome of scientific research should have a say in how it should proceed, be funded, etc.
Since we have long known (and Kitcher himself is aware of the fact) that the outcome of basic scientific research is unknown, i.e. we do not know what position (if any) it will affect, we cannot realistically adopt Kitcher's suggestion. His proposal is emmently sensible in technology, where the goal is not to know but to change or prevent change. But the history of science shows that the proposal of making basic science sensitive to people's interests _that_ way will not work. Further, it is vague, even if it could be done: how do we determine the effect? Christian conservatives like Philip Johnson would curtail or slow research into evolution because he feels it is socially undermining; biologists and
other scientists (rightly) regard this as distressing. Science *should* puncture illusions, as Kitcher points out happens. On the other hand, if the "say" is simply to be a sort of "gripe session" where people can say their piece to scientists, this is a recipe for squabble, or worse, just ignoring people, which is the (perceived) problem in the management of science now.
(I think actually that the insistence from some that science is alienating because it is undemocratic is wrong, but that's another story.)
One should not read this book, however, without a grasp of some of the issues this review sort of brings up. As another reviewer said it is sort of for the academic. I wish that weren't so: but sometimes we academics have to debate amongst ourselves a bit first, before popularizations come out. Of course this is just some of the same concerns again ... and around we go.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful.
Thoughtful and Somewhat Mistaken; 3.5 Stars
By R. Albin
This concise and clear book is an extended essay examining the role of science in democratic societies. Kitcher is a well known philosopher of science and this book is an attempt to move philosophical investigations of science as a general phenomenon beyond the relatively narrow epistemic concerns of most philosophy of science. Despite the relative brevity of this book, Kitcher has a relatively ambitious agenda. He wishes to examine the epistemic credentials of science of an enterprise, to explore the consequences of the epistemic reliability of science in terms of its social functions, and to sketch out the proper way democracies should deal with science. Kitcher is particularly concerned with steering a valid course between 2 opposing, almost caricature positions; the view that science has virtually unique moral value and is largely insulated from social influences and the view that science has weak epistemic foundations with the research agenda and results driven by pragmatic and authoritarian concerns.
Kitcher espouses what he terms modest realism; a definite endorsement of the epistemic validity of science with a strong fallibalist orientation. The section of the book in which he deals with attacks on the epistemic validity of science is one of the strongest portions and his fallibalist realism is a strong position. Kitcher, however, suggests that while the methods and achievements of science are definitely valid, the choice of research problems and programs is, however, driven strongly by other concerns. In this sense, Kitcher sees science as hardly insulated from social and personal concerns and in important senses capable of being manipulated in potentially sinister ways. Kitcher is very concerned with the ways in which science and scientific knowledge may be abused to the disadvantage of disadvantaged members of society. Kitcher attacks the idea of the moral purity of scientific investigation and the highly arbitrary (and really impossible to defend) distinction between science and technology. Kitcher's proposed approach is what he calls "well-ordered" science in which selection of research programs, the actual selection of individual projects, and use of knowledge generated would be the subject of some form of inclusive deliberative democracy to ensure socially appropriate scientific investigation. I want to stress that Kitcher is no starry-eyed idealist, this is not a serious reform proposal but rather an intellectual device to measure how far we are away from a really democratic approach to science, an intellectually useful instrument. This brief sketch doesn't do justice to Kitcher's careful development of his arguments, including some useful examples. One example used is the experience of the human genome project, whose development and governance Kitcher demonstrates as violating his concepts of well-ordered science.
Kitcher's arguments, however, are problematic in several respects. Its hard to disagree with the general proposition that pragmatic and social concerns influence the selection of research problems and sometimes how science is practiced. Kitcher takes this argument too far. As an example of pragmatic approaches to science he gives the example of different methods of taxonomic classification in animals and prokaryotes, pointing out the use of the biological species concept (BSC) for the former and molecular methods for the latter. But, these differences are more epistemically based than Kitcher's discussion implies. How much sense does the BSC make for organisms with high rates of horizontal gene transfer? If the taxonomy example is representative of Kitcher's conception of how scientific practice is driven by pragmatic, strictly extra-scientific concerns, then Kitcher's emphasis is misplaced. Kitcher points also to the historical variation in choice of research problems as an example of how science is influenced by strictly extra-scientific issues. But, one of the most important determinants of selection of research problems is the knowledge and theory generated by prior scientific investigations. The issue of the origin of the universe became a major scientific issue only after Einstein's development of General Relativity Theory. It seems likely that science as an enterprise is driven more by internal concerns than Kitcher's discussion implies and has a greater degree of autonomy than his model suggests.
Kitcher's concern about the abuse of science and the potential for negative impacts on the disadvantaged does him credit but may also be misplaced. As pointed out recently by the historian Naomi Oreskes, this is not the major recent problem with science and science policy. The biggest recent social conflict related to science has been the unwillingness of major interest groups in our society to accept the unpalatable consequences of major scientific findings. The present and likely future consequences of environmental problems, particularly anthropogenic global warming, resulted in major efforts to discredit both the general conclusions and some of the individual investigators involved. Since the most severe consequences of climate change will fall upon the poor in poorer nations, this is a direct counter-example to his concerns about the abuse of science. The discovery of anthropogenic global warming, ozone depletion, and acid rain, among others, are massive challenges to traditional models of social and economic organization, and have been resisted bitterly by conservative forces. Again, this is solid evidence that science has a good deal more autonomy than Kitcher's model indicates.
Kitcher also argues that science, as a general activity, does not deserve a uniquely privileged status. He has a strong argument based essentially on the difficulty of constructing a consensus view of human values. Fair enough, but from a more pragmatic and historical point of view, its very clear that providing scientists with generous funding and considerable freedom in running the scientific enterprise has consistently yielded great dividends. In the weakest part of the book, Kitcher tries to argue that the evidence for the consistent benefits of science is poorly developed. Its not too strong to call this part of Kitcher's book rubbish. Given Kitcher's general level of rigor, this is a rather surprising and disappointing argument.
Finally, I share Kitcher's high regard for open, democratic, "deliberative" procedures. In this context, its worth mentioning that one of few institutions in our society that uses such procedures successfully are grant application review panels for NIH, NSF, and other funding agencies (including some private foundations that fund research). In this respect, and in some others, our democracy would be improved substantially by making public life more like science.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
read this if you are involved in scientific research
By Robert E. Pierson
Kitcher's Science, Truth and Democracy is an important book but tough to read. Sorry to philosophers, but I'm reviewing as an engineer here and writing this review to encourage fellow scientists and engineers to stick through the rhetoric to get to the final chapter on "Research in an Imperfect World."
Overall, Kitcher make the case FOR science -- that there is objective truth that science can deliver. But the fact that science delivers "truth" doesn't let scientific inquiry off the hook as if "free inquiry" could justify itself as some sort of holy enterprise. Science depends on a conceptual map of reality that determines which questions are significant and which are not. That map is not neutral. It evolves from past maps, so it depends both on history and current context. Which questions we choose to explore (i.e. fund) and which we don't (because funds are limited) have implications. Kitcher makes the case that the pretense of "free inquiry" often masks impacts on exactly those groups that are already disadvantaged in the society. In an ideal world where we value democracy, inquiry must be driven by the collective preference of educated citizens.
But this ideal does not exist. So, Kitcher's final chapter articulates the dilemma many of us face - being entangled in institutions that makes us either willfully ignorant of or functionally impotent to prevent distortions to what is significant and the resulting harm to those who have no voice. What are we to do? Stick through the logical thicket of Kitcher's philosophical argument and you'll find yourself face to face with this ethical challenge.
See all 8 customer reviews...
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher PDF
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher EPub
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher Doc
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher iBooks
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher rtf
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher Mobipocket
Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher Kindle
[H499.Ebook] Free Ebook Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher Doc
[H499.Ebook] Free Ebook Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher Doc
[H499.Ebook] Free Ebook Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher Doc
[H499.Ebook] Free Ebook Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Science), by Philip Kitcher Doc
